This is a long essay that has a lot of truth in it, but the author doesn't take what I see as the logical next step: that there were no hijacked airplanes at all on 9/11. He pretty much stays with the fact that the airplanes have not been properly identified, which is a good point all by itself and which does not contradict the no plane theory in any way.
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2010/03/19/a-little-known-fact-about-the-911-planes/
However the NTSB has confirmed that-apparently for the first time from its inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000 other aviation accidents-it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes which occurred on September 11, 2001. So the world has been asked to take it on faith and hearsay that the four planes involved were normal scheduled flights which were hijacked by Arab terrorists, some of whom, are, allegedly, still alive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The official 9/11 story has so many holes, it looks like swiss cheese.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work!
from another Dr Wood fan
So I suppose the testimony of thousands of eyewitnesses who saw the planes crash into the towers on 9/11 can be discounted because it contradicts the "no plane" theory. Thousands of eyewitnesses. Who did not see it on TV or on video, but who saw it with their own eyes.
ReplyDeleteI suppose the physical wreckage of the planes that was found in the WTC towers, the Pentagon and the field in Shanksville can be discounted because it contradicts the "no plane" theory.
I suppose the fact that Barbara Olson and dozens of other passengers who were never seen alive again after boarding those planes on the morning of 9/11 can be discounted because it contradicts the "no plane" theory.
I suppose the black boxes that were recovered from flights 93 and 77 can be discounted because they contradict the "no plane" theory.